i don't agree

  • The composition of the original i far better than this crop..
    Here we don't see lines, landscape.
    The only thing about the original to me is a lack of contrast..
  • Re: i don't agree
    OK Claude ... you don't have to agree,the world is more interesting due to the fact people have different opinions ...

    The subject of this photo is the woman and the hard work she is doing ... The house in the back has no relevance and distracts the eye from the composition!

    I don't know if you ever worked in a rice field ...
    I did ... And I find that in order to enhance the image the background and the canal in the foreground should have been cropped ... The woman,the rice and the earth...they are the subject.

    I also believe that in your workshop you added too much contrast and burned completely the rice and the woman's conical hat ... you should have compensated for that by at least reducing the brightness ...

    But as I said , to each his own opinion,that makes the world a richer and more interesting place .

    Regards ,

    Dror.

    P.S. I think it was Rousseau that said:"I don't agree with a single word you say,but I will fight so you will be able to say it ..."
  • Re: i don't agree
    don't take it wrong.I hope I didn't offend you saying that, I believe it's just a matter of taste.I must say I like tthe graphismof the landscape ..
    it's always nice to see people doing wS. At least you took some time to say and explain your point. I believe this is the purppose of this site..

    I also know the one I did is't good, in the sense that you really would need the roiginal to do something good.
    tale care
  • Re: i don't agree
    Not at all Claude ...

    On the contrary, I think it is excellent that people
    have different perspectives and views and are able to share them .

    As the Americans say: Different strokes for different folks ...

    Keep up your good work and take care !

    Dror.